CO2 emissions from trade-related maritime transport | Nature Climate Change

  • 1.

    Review of maritime transport 2019 (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2019); https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2019_en.pdf

  • 2.

    Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study (International Maritime Organization, 2020).

  • 3.

    Bows-Larkin, A., Anderson, K., Mander, S., Traut, M. & Walsh, C. Shipping chart a high carbon path. Nat. Clim. Switch 5, 293-295 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • 4.

    Peters, GP et al. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to rise amid slowly emerging climate policies. Nat. Clim. Switch ten, 3-6 (2020).

    Google Scholar article

  • 5.

    Crippa, M. et al. Fossil CO2 Emissions from all countries of the world — Report 2020 (Publications Office of the European Union, 2020); https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2020

  • 6.

    Capaldo, K., Corbett, JJ, Kasibhatla, P., Fischbeck, P. & Pandis, SN Effects of ship emissions on the sulfur cycle and radiative climate forcing over the ocean. Nature 400, 743-746 (1999).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 7.

    Doelle, M. L’Accord de Paris: historic breakthrough or high-stakes experience? Clim. Law 6, 1–20 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 8.

    Traut, M. et al. CO2 reduction targets for international shipping. Clim. Politics 18, 1066-1075 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 9.

    IMO Initial Strategy on Reducing GHG Emissions from Ships MEPC.304 (72) (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2018); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.304(72).pdf

  • ten.

    2012 Guidance on the Method for Calculating the Achieved Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships MEPC.212 (63); Annex 8 (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2012); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.212(63).pdf

  • 11.

    2012 Guidelines for the Development of a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) MEPC.212 (63); Annex 9 (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2012); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/213(63).pdf

  • 12.

    Guidelines for the voluntary use of the operational ship energy efficiency indicator MEPC.213 (65) (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2009); https://gmn.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Circ-684-EEOI-Guidelines.pdf

  • 13.

    Shi, Y. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Shipping: Is It Time to Consider Market-Based Measures? March Policy 64, 123-134 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 14.

    Bouman, EA, Lindstad, E., Rialland, AI & Strømman, AH Advanced technologies, measures and potential for reducing GHG emissions from maritime transport – a review. Transp. Res. D 52, 408-421 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 15.

    Mallouppas, G. & Yfantis, EA Decarbonization in the Shipping Industry: A Review of Research, Technological Development and Innovation Proposals. J. Mar. Sci. Ing. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040415 (2021).

  • 16.

    Balcombe, P. et al. How to Decarbonize International Shipping: Options for Fuels, Technologies and Policies. Energy Convers. To manage. 182, 72-88 (2019).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 17.

    Report of its subsidiary body for scientific and technological advice on the fourth session held in Geneva from December 16 to 18, 1996 FCCC / SBSTA / 1996/9 / Add.1 (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1996); https://unfccc.int/documents/1439

  • 18.

    Corbett, JJ & Fischbeck, P. Ship emissions. Science 278, 823-824 (1997).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 19.

    Cadarso, M.-Á., López, L.-A., Gómez, N. & Tobarra, M.-Á. CO2 emissions from international freight transport and offshoring: measurement and allocation. School. Econ. 69, 1682-1694 (2010).

    Google Scholar article

  • 20.

    Heitmann, N. & Khalilian, S. Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping: burden sharing under different allocation options and UNFCCC regime scenarios. March Policy 35, 682-691 (2011).

    Google Scholar article

  • 21.

    Rahim, MM, Islam, MT & Kuruppu, S. Regulating the Responsibility of Global Shipping Companies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Seas. March Policy 69, 159-170 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 22.

    den Elzen, MGJ, Oilvier, JGJ & Berk, MM An analysis of options for including emissions from international aviation and the sea in a post-2012 climate mitigation regime (Dutch Environmental Assessment Agency, 2007).

  • 23.

    Selin, H., Zhang, Y., Dunn, R., Selin, NE & Lau, AKH CO attenuation2 emissions from international shipping through national allocation. About. Res. Lett. 16, 045009 (2021).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 24.

    Lee, T.-C., Lam, JSL & Lee, PT-W. Asian economic integration and maritime CO2 emissions. Transp. Res. D 43, 226-237 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 25.

    Cristea, A., Hummels, D., Puzzello, L. & Avetisyan, M. Trade and greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport. J. Approx. Econ. To manage. 65, 153-173 (2013).

    Google Scholar article

  • 26.

    Martínez, LM, Kauppila, J. & Castaing, M. International freight and associated carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. Transp. Res. Rec. 2477, 58-67 (2015).

    Google Scholar article

  • 27.

    Yoon, Y., Yang, M. & Kim, J. An analysis of CO2 emissions from international transport and the driving forces behind emissions are changing. Durability https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051677 (2018).

  • 28.

    Stojanović, Đ., Ivetić, J. & Veličković, M. Assessment of international transport related to CO trade2 emissions — a logistical responsibility perspective. Durability https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031138 (2021).

  • 29.

    Nunes, RAO, Alvim-Ferraz, MCM, Martins, FG & Sousa, SIV The Activity-Based Methodology for Assessing Emissions from Ships — A Review. About. Pollute. 231, 87-103 (2017).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 30.

    Johansson, L., Jalkanen, J.-P. & Kukkonen, J. Global assessment of emissions from maritime transport in 2015 at high spatial and temporal resolution. Atmos. About. 167, 403-415 (2017).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 31.

    Liu, H. et al. Health and Climate Impacts of Ocean-Going Vessels in East Asia. Nat. Clim. Switch 6, 1037-1041 (2016).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 32.

    Winther, M. et al. Arctic ship emissions inventories based on AIS satellite sampled data. Atmos. About. 91, 1-14 (2014).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 33.

    Jalkanen, JP, Johansson, L. & Kukkonen, J. A comprehensive inventory of marine traffic exhaust emissions in European maritime areas in 2011. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 71-84 (2016).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 34.

    Schim van der Loeff, W., Godar, J. & Prakash, V. A spatially explicit data-driven approach to calculate product-specific shipping emissions per ship. J. Clean. Prod. 205, 895-908 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 35.

    Liu, H. et al. Emissions and health impacts of global shipping embodied in bilateral trade between the United States and China. Nat. To support. 2, 1027-1033 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 36.

    Adland, R., Jia, H. & Strandenes, SP Determinants of vessel capacity utilization: the case of Brazilian iron ore exports. Transp. Res. A 110, 191-201 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Prill, K. & Igielski, K. Calculation of the EEOI operational indicator for ships designed for purposes other than ship-based research training ship. New trends Prod. Ing. 1, 335-340 (2018).

    Google Scholar article

  • 38.

    Streets, DG, Guttikunda, SK & Carmichael, GR The increasing contribution of sulfur emissions from ships in Asian waters, 1988-1995. Atmos. About. 34, 4425-4439 (2000).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 39.

    Liu, J. & Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalized world. Nature 435, 1179-1186 (2005).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 40.

    Andersen, O. et al. CO2 emissions from the transport of goods exported from China. Energy policy 38, 5790-5798 (2010).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 41.

    Davis, SJ & Caldeira, K. Consumption Based CO Accounting2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 107, 5687-5692 (2010).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 42.

    Peters, GP & Hertwich, EG CO2 incorporated into international trade with implications for global climate policy. About. Sci. Technol. 42, 1401-1407 (2008).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 43.

    The existing maritime fleets CO2 Efficiency (UCL Energy Institute, 2015); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/MEPC%2068%20INF%2024%20REV1%20The%20existing%20shipping%20fleet%20CO2%20efficiency.pdf

  • 44.

    Cherkassky, BV, Goldberg, AV & Radzik, T. Shortest path algorithms: theory and experimental evaluation. Math. Program. 73, 129-174 (1996).

    Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Shipping statistics directory (Institute of Maritime Transport Economics and Logistics, 2017).


  • Source link

    Comments are closed.